In July 2020, when Wood was due to hand over the agreed share of the Sandmann money to his ex-partners, he instead insisted that he couldn’t give them any money because the unnamed client had objected to anyone besides Wood receiving money. “This needs to be nipped on the bud and quickly so.” “Their efforts to be greedy could damage me, my family, my legacy, and my clients-which include your clients if the disputes become public,” Wood allegedly wrote to McMurtry. If genuine, the emails show Wood plotting, in detail, to make sure that his ex-partners wouldn’t receive money from Sandmann’s cases, even as he moved closer to signing an agreement with them to share the funds. “In short, I need your help and the help of to nip this nonsense in the bud quickly and quietly… Will you help me?” Wood wrote, according to one court filing. In the emails, entitled “A good idea!” and “Taylor, Jonathan, and Nicole,” Wood purportedly pressed McMurtry to work with the “Disputed Client” to sign an agreement that would take advantage of a Georgia legal rule about payments by objecting to the three other lawyers receiving any money from the Sandmann cases. one day in February 2020, the ex-partners allege, Wood sent two emails to Todd McMurtry, his co-counsel on the Sandmann cases. But now, the plaintiffs in the case say Wood was already scheming behind the scenes to dupe them out of the settlement money.Īround 3 a.m. For his part, while Wood concedes he described the lawyers as his “partners,” he says they were never truly partners in his firm.Īs part of the firm’s break-up, Wood agreed in a March 2020 agreement to pay his ex-partners an undisclosed amount of what he would receive from Sandmann’s settlements. Those settlements are now at the center of the lawsuit between Wood and his ex-partners, who quit his practice in 2020 after a series of bizarre incidents involving Wood, including an alleged assault on one of the lawyers. With Wood as one of his attorneys, Sandmann settled cases against CNN and The Washington Postfor undisclosed amounts in 2020. Sandmann’s much-discussed 2019 encounter with a Native American activist at the Lincoln Memorial created a national media debate and turned the MAGA hat-wearing student into a conservative cause célèbre. ![]() While Sandmann is only described as an unnamed “Disputed Client” in legal filings around the case, it’s clear from details in the motions that he’s the person being described. ![]() Since September 2020, Wood and three former partners in his office-Nicole Wade, Jonathan Grunberg, and Taylor Wilson-have been locked in a legal fight over the fate of an undisclosed amount of money from settlements involving former Kentucky high school student Nick Sandmann. Wood is already facing an unrelated potential disbarment in his home state of Georgia after refusing to take a mental-health exam. In August, a federal judge in Michigan referred Wood, Sidney Powell, and other lawyers involved in a 2020 election case to their state bars for potential suspension or disbarment, and ordered them to pay legal fees that could run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. While Wood made his name as a lawyer for people like falsely accused Atlanta Olympics bombing suspect Richard Jewell, he’s since faced a series of professional setbacks after pivoting toward hunting vaporous evidence of “voter fraud” and promoting the QAnon conspiracy theory. Making matters worse for Wood, his one-time partners say he wrote the alleged scheme down in a series of late-night emails-documents they now have. Embattled pro-Trump lawyer Lin Wood could soon be in even more legal hot water, following allegations by former law partners that he lied to a judge and covered up a scheme to steal their share of settlements involving former Covington Catholic student Nick Sandmann.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |